Burning wood for power is often worse for the climate than fossil fuels, including natural gas, because it releases more carbon dioxide. (CO2 πΆπ2) per unit of energy produced, creates a "carbon debt" that takes decades to repay through forest regrowth, and reduces the forest's capacity to absorb existing atmospheric CO2πΆπ2
Burning wood for power is often worse for the climate than fossil fuels, including natural gas, because it releases more carbon dioxide. (CO2 πΆπ2) per unit of energy produced, creates a "carbon debt" that takes decades to repay through forest regrowth, and reduces the forest's capacity to absorb existing atmospheric CO2πΆπ2 Key Findings on Burning Wood vs. Fossil Fuels Higher Emissions: - Wood bioenergy can emit more CO2πΆπ2 per kilowatt-hour of electricity generated than even coal, often emitting 75% more CO2 πΆπ2 than fossil gas. Decades-Long Carbon Debt: - When trees are cut down and burned, the carbon stored over decades is released instantly, but it can take 50 to 100+ years for new trees to reabsorb that CO2 πΆπ2. Inefficiency: - Fresh wood is heavy with water, requiring significant energy to dry before burning, making biomass power plants less efficient than fossil fuel plants. Impact of BECCS: - Even with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), burning wood is u...